Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Hunter (card player)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Brian Hunter (card player)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete Non-notable, significance asserted. -Zeus- [ t|c ] 16:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good grief. As per nom. Proxy User (talk) 18:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge - The world champions of SWCCG are listed here Star Wars Customizable Card Game, and perhaps Brian can be merged to that article somehow? Otherwise delete.  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  19:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidently notable as champion of a notable game, covered as such in reliable sources. Colonel Warden (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - First of all, what reliable sources, and second, if I recall correctly from my searching several days ago, he was never champion, the best he did was finish second. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  06:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  01:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The only source currently listed in the article carries a byline of... Brian Hunter. I couldn't find anything else about him beyond bare lists of people who play this game. Townlake (talk) 05:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable, finding no reliable source coverage. Could be redirected to Star Wars Customizable Card Game, per User:LinguistAtLarge, but that's not a likely search phrase, and he doesn't deserve more coverage in that article than he already has.  Baileypalblue (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.