Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian J. Robb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Brian J. Robb

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Autobiography whose only references are weak sources, such as the "about the author" statement on a marketing profile of his book on a not-terribly-notable website. While it's certainly possible that he's notable in principle, this article as written definitely doesn't demonstrate that — if somebody can come along in the future and write a good article about him, that'll be fine and dandy, but this version doesn't cut the mustard in the least. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:21, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 6.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  08:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The only criteria at WP:AUTHOR which he might pass is "subject of ... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews". However, all I can find is this - and the review itself doesn't actually seem to be available any more. He's written quite a few celebrity biogs, but nothing that seems to have popped up on the notability radar. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 08:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:AUTOBIO. -- Trevj (talk) 11:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.