Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian James Freeman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  12:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Brian James Freeman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable author, only notable for knowing a guy who studied Steven King who probably isn’t even notable himself. Dronebogus (talk) 07:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 07:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep He won a notable award, Bram Stoker Award for Best First Novel for Black Fire, using the name James Kidman. Some of his books, thus his writing, did get reviewed such as at: https://ew.com/books/the-zombie-who-cried-human-sneak-peek/ https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-9838071-6-2    D r e a m Focus  00:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Per DreamFocus.★Trekker (talk) 09:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * this is just an unrelated technical comment, but “speedy keep” is only for AfDs so inarguably obvious there’s no point in presenting evidence— i.e. there’s a huge number of reliable sources already on the page or the nomination is gibberish. You might be thinking of the WP:SNOWBALL clause, which is similar but less extreme. Dronebogus (talk) 11:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * "Speedy Keep" is also used in instances where the nomination is withdrawn and there are no other opinions in favour of deletion. It has become shorthand for "you should probably withdraw this", thus facilitating a speedy keep. You are, of course, free to disregard such a suggestion.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 07:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I added references to his some of his books I found reviews for.  D r e a m Focus  15:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - the award and reviews are enough for me.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 07:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.