Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Keene (lawyer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Brian Keene (lawyer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. gadfium 08:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No real assertion that he is especially important. Gets mentions in the paper but just 1-liners from trials - SimonLyall (talk) 01:53, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing to have in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, as per the WP:GNG. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.