Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Kerr (photographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Brian Kerr (photographer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable photographer. The only link I can find to a notable source is to the use of his photography as illustrations in a Government publication. Other links all seem to be to blogs, sales, a PR company he uses and so forth. Jenafalt (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  —Jenafalt (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete In my opinion, Brian Kerr doesn't meet the Notability criteria for photographers.--Vejvančický (talk) 20:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenafalt (talk • contribs) 12:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete He's got an impressive resume with some fine work and a nice website, but so does Edward Flannighan, Mike Harrison, and likely hundreds of others. My point is there's nothing exceptional about this particular photographer that makes him stand out above others and make him worthy of an encyclopedia entry. I could not find any mention of awards won or any reliable secondary references to media coverage.. through Google anyway (the Guardian article uses one of his images but it is not about him specifically). So unless someone can provide some sources from elsewhere that assert his notability or even his cultural presence, despite my inclination towards inclusionism I must say delete. -- &oelig; &trade; 02:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.