Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Lamontagne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Contested speedy deletion by contributer. –BuickCenturyDriver 13:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Brian Lamontagne

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Notes Reasons for original speedy deletion: biography that does not assert notability of subject. Additional point, article was created by the manager of subject, so a conflict of interest may apply. i kan reed (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete After reviewing the availability of verifiable sources for this subject, I'm forced to suggest deletion. i kan reed (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - for someone "known throughout the United States", he has an unusual lack of presence in literature and news. Marasmusine (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as I could find no reliable sources describing this person in depth. I, too, am a model citizen and since I have friends from New York to California and several other states as well, I guess I am also "known throughout the United States".   Please stop me if I try to write a Wikipedia article about myself. Cullen328 (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, only claims to notability are vague at best. Hairhorn (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence the subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. Speedy deletion (A7) would be reasonable too.  Peacock (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 HrafnTalkStalk(P) 06:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.