Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Moore's Head Looks Uncannily Like London Planetarium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Brian Moore&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Even though this fanzine is devoted to the team I support and I own many issues, I can't see any claim to notability whatsoever - only reference is to a cursory sentence on a website selling back issues, and the only other Ghits of relevance were passing mentions in articles about the club or Brian Moore himself..... ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure about this one yet, references online refer to it as "award winning" without referring to what award, and it is pretty well known due to its name and its longevity. Also, which came first, the fanzine or the Half Man Half Biscuit song Dickie Davies' Eyes? - fchd (talk) 12:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The song was on an album released in 1987, whereas the fanzine began publication the following year -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I take it there's a reason why we can't merge and redirect to Gillingham F.C.? Hiding T 13:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It was, as I recall, certainly among the more acclaimed fanzines. If the refs are traceable, would they render the article worthy of retention?  I'll admit to the same bias as CtD on this one.  Kevin McE (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Obviously if refs could be found, I'd be more than happy to withdraw, but is it especially likely that a fanzine will have been the subject of reliable sources.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:40, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I can conceive of a magazine such as FourFourTwo doing an article on fanzines, and I think they'd be an RS. Now, the question is, did they .... MadScot (talk) 00:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete As per nominator I can not really see the notability. A bit of RS and references could swing me on this, largely because of its longevity of publication-- Club Oranje Talk 11:37, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment, have added reliable sources as of timestamp to this comment, so after all comments above. Hiding T 15:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - With Hiding's sources this seems safe(r). ntnon (talk) 00:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.