Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Regnier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Kurykh  00:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Brian Regnier

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has been tagged requesting notability information for two months. Nothing on the page indicates that the subject is notable, and everything is written in a promotional fashion - including the boldfacing of the subject's name.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 22:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources could be found in a cursory search. Unless the gentleman in question was the CEO or sole founder of any of the corporations listed, he does not get notability inherited per WP:BIO. He is not once mentioned in the Werner Erhard and Associates article and is listed as the "course designer" of Landmark Education. Doesn't exactly sound like Steve Jobs to me. VanTucky  (talk) 23:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable organiser in a cultish scam operation. Nick mallory 23:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above. Cquan (after the beep...) 23:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per nom and VanTucky. Landmark may be wacky, but it's notable.  I'm just not convinced he is notable. Bearian 02:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, Landmark is notable, as scams go, but the flunkies are not. Nick mallory 04:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.