Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian T. Kennedy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Brian T. Kennedy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. Most references are to organization individual runs. Almost all published works are published through organization individual runs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.169.165.19 (talk) 02:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I completed the nom for the IP. Ansh666 07:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, while the subject has written articles, and is the head of a notable organization, the individual themselves does not appear to have received significant coverage from multiple secondary or tertiary reliable sources to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG. Furthermore as the subject is not notable for a single event a redirect to an event does not qualify as an alternative. All this being said, I would not object to recreation of this article if it can be shown using reliable source that the subject meets GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Mr. Kennedy is obviously a prolific writer. However, currently, there is not independent significant coverage of him.-- danntm T C 05:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * DeleteThere seems to be no independent publishing of this writer. More references to published sources would be preferable to linking back to articles he writes for his own organization. Dandy-viking 21:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per comments above and the very POV-y text you see upon only glancing at the article. Cheers, Thanks,  L235 - Talk Ping when replying 21:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.