Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Wilson Disney Album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No prejudice against recreation at the actual album title once there is more to say than that it is going to exist at some point. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Brian Wilson Disney Album

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Prod removed by author without explanation. Fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:CRYSTAL; the only source given in the article is a blog and a search for sources turned up only more blogs and forums. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 02:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete - While WP:CRYSTAL does allow some yet-to-be-released albums to have articles, I don't see how this one qualifies. There seems to be a great deal of doubt as to whether this album will ever be released, or if its very existence is anything more than a hoax.
 * Also, note that the article's creator, ParksAsher, just yesterday created a duplicate of the article here. I mention this firstly so that, if the consensus here is to delete, the duplicate will be deleted along with the original. Secondly, while ordinarily I would assume ParksAsher simply didn't know about redirects, he created this page immediately after altering the AfD banner on Brian Wilson Disney Album. So that means he created a duplicate of an article which he knew was undergoing deletion discussion, which is very suspicious to say the least.--Martin IIIa (talk) 17:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: The article creator has added a reliable source that came out within the last 24 hours that corroborates the existence of this album. However, I am not inclined to withdraw this nomination quite yet, as existence ≠ notability, and WP:NALBUMS states that "Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release" (original emphasis). I will withdraw and recommend keep only if a couple of additional reliable sources are found. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * There should only be one article for the album "In the Key of Disney". If there are duplicate articles, keep one, as the album has been confirmed. If "Brian Wilson Disney Album" is the only article left, simply move it to "In the Key of Disney". -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:49, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:VERIFY. This album, when released, is sure to garner coverage by reliable sources, but that has not happened yet.  No prejudice against recreation at In the Key of Disney when that happens. — Satori Son 21:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article creator has added a reliable source that came out within the last 24 hours that corroborates the existence of this album. However, I am not inclined to withdraw this nomination quite yet, as existence ≠ notability, and WP:NALBUMS states that "Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release" (original emphasis). I will withdraw and recommend keep only if a couple of additional reliable sources are found. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * There should only be one article for the album "In the Key of Disney". If there are duplicate articles, keep one, as the album has been confirmed. If "Brian Wilson Disney Album" is the only article left, simply move it to "In the Key of Disney". -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:49, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge all such articles to Brian Wilson and Disney or a Disney music article until there are enough info and sources to justify a standalone article such as this and not run afoul of WP:CRYSTAL.  —  Jeff G.  ツ  22:42, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atmoz (talk) 13:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Between Delete and Strong Delete-While the creator of the article has indeed added a somewhat reliable reference to the section with the link to the blog, I cannot let this article go on, mainly because of the fact that the second paragraph is eating at me like a swarm of no-see-ums. I've yet to check out the blog, but it sounds like a thinly veiled copy of what would be on the blog. And if the creator has resorted to creating another copy of the article, then it should be deleted. Beluga  boy ''cup of tea? 14:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.