Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Wood (solider)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 06:13, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Brian Wood (solider)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:SOLDIER Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk</b>) 06:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. While subject doesnt pass WP:SOLDIER but it passes WP:GNG of the ordeal where I have added 3 more sources - see |title=Iraq war probe 'damaging' says soldier,, |title=Double Crossed by Brian Wood review — a soldier ambushed in the courtroom and . <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 06:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep He doespass WP: Soldier as he is apart of two significant events: the Iraq Al-Sweady Inquiry and for leading the first British Bayonet charge in 25 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CalderUK (talk • contribs) 08:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Neutral comment CalderUK, please sign your posts and follow AfD voting protocol; we don't break out headings on simple vote!s because they break the daily AfD log. I have fixed your vote! with no refactoring outside the title, which isn't needed.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep while he doesn't pass WP:SOLDIER he does pass WP:GNG due to coverage from the false war crimes allegations and surrounding controversy and may also be notable as an author. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:13, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with CalderUK that he does pass WP:SOLDIER, and passes WP:GNG due to media coverage. Because were have involvement in two separate notable incidents, WP:BLP1E does not apply.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  19:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.