Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briana Buckmaster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Briana Buckmaster

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've been watching this article since it began, and the recent PROD was removed (by SPA of course) with the thin and unconvincing basis of "she appears at fan conventions so she can be included here", because her career is not applicably convincing or basically convincing at all, the longest work has been 4 episodes of Supernatural and then 25 as a crewmember for something else. None of this suggests an acceptable article nor are there the signs of it. SwisterTwister  talk  18:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – As the person who added the PROD, I agree that there isn't enough for an article. Notability is not inherited. – nyuszika7h (talk) 19:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete – purely a TV guest actress who does not pass WP:NACTOR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete IMDb is not a good source to show notability, it aims to be a listing of all people who have acted either in film or TV, Wikipedia has a far tighter inclusion criteria. A person's own resume is neither indepedent nor secondary. So we have 0 sources that contribute to passing the GNG.
 * Delete. "Appears at fan conventions" is not, in and of itself, a reason why a bit part actress gets a Wikipedia article that can be sourced only to IMDb and her own acting résumé on the website of her agent. It takes reliable source coverage in media to get her in the door, but none of that is being shown. Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.