Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briana Waters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to University of Washington firebombing incident.  Sandstein  05:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Briana Waters

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet our notability standards. BLP. Moral Authority (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per others.--Judo112 (talk) 17:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Apparently only convicted of being the lookout. BLP1E would seem to apply here -- I don't think the "support Briana" material is sufficient to confirm notability.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment:The nominator was a suspected sockpuppet and has since he was accused retired suddenly. Take this into account. I still say Keep on this article.--Judo112 (talk) 17:12, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Rename, as with the Solondz article, to University of Washington firebombing incident and redirect this name. The event was very much notable and deserves an article. BLP1E doesn't mean delete outright. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * So one could say that you are against a deletion. but want it to be about the incident more than the person.--Judo112 (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct. I think it should be kept and renamed to an article about the incident, then the name redirected there. Same for the Solondz article. I guess it would actually be Merge and redirect &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 22:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect as long as any pertinent content is merged with the University of Washington firebombing incident article. --Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 17:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sarek's argument. RMHED .  20:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Just as before you cant say both Delete and redirect. Or else both your arguments will be discounted for when closing this discussion.--Judo112 (talk) 08:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to University of Washington firebombing incident since it is conceivable that "Briana Waters" might be used as a search term. Location (talk) 20:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. You have now to decide once again. delete or redirect...or else your arguments will be discounted when a admin is closing this discussion.--Judo112 (talk) 08:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you mean to address me? Location (talk) 20:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I rest my case and let the closing admin decide if someone has done anything wrong or whatever. not accusing you. cheers.--Judo112 (talk) 20:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm just wondering why it appears you are instructing me to "redirect or delete" when my recommendation was already "redirect". Location (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to University of Washington firebombing incidentThis individual is not notable enough for own WP:BIO. However the event itself is notable. This would be the correct application of WP:BLP1E. Nolamgm (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.