Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianne Siddall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Since no one has argued that this article has adequate sourcing for a BLP thi sleaves us with two guidelines in tension. Since wider community norms are that we should source a BLP and an SNG is supposed to be a guide to whether sources exist it appears that the delete arguments are stronger. Spartaz Humbug! 21:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Brianne Siddall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No in-depth WP:SECONDARY coverage of Siddall's life or career, only listing entries and mentions-in-passing. Binksternet (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - appears to meet WP:ENTERTAINER. Needs relevant cites added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VMS Mosaic (talk • contribs)
 * I don't think this meets ENTERTAINER. Can you specify why you think so? Binksternet (talk) 15:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Probably because some of the roles are main characters in notable series.  D r e a m Focus  23:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep It passes WP:ENTERTAINER as the person has had significant roles in various notable television shows.  D r e a m Focus  17:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete BLP lacking a single reliable source; also, unable to find sources meeting WP:GNG. --j⚛e deckertalk 04:57, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per Joe Decker. I'm starting to think the definition of "significant roles" for WP:ENTERTAINER is really subjective (and probably should be changed). But that's the existing policy. Article subject has primarily one-time or small side-characters. No where near as many 'lead roles' as say, someone like Johnny Yong Bosch. --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 13:52, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * YuYu Hakusho is a major series, and this person played a main character, Lord Koenma(the guy in charge of things who is seen in most every episode of the show) in the the movie. I didn't bother to look through every single thing on the list, but there have been significant roles they have done.   D r e a m Focus  06:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Regardless, I don't think there're sources meeting WP:GNG. --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 15:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The character in question is listed as supporting cast, under 31 or 32 apparently more signficant characters, and note that our own article lists four voice actors for this role. The role is credited under an entirely different name, which threw me for a bit, I thought at first it was entirely a hoax, but perhaps not. Perhaps. --j⚛e deckertalk 01:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are certainly less notable VAs with articles, why single out this one? Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 14:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:OTHERCRAP --180.155.72.174 (talk) 05:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep but find better sources, and if that is not done in 6 months or so, reopen the debate. In almost all cases better sources exist for people who have had notable roles in multiple shows, we just need to find them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:07, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.