Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briar Prestidge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Briar Prestidge

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not convinced that there's enough independent coverage to meet WP:NBIO. KH-1 (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Keep  not a field I have a lot of expertise in but once you sort through all the self publicity and promotional stuff on line she seems to have reasonable substance within her field. The wiki article needs a major overhaul as it is promotional in nature rather than encyclopedic. NealeWellington (talk) 08:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete the more I looked the less I found. All the articles seem to be self promotional. There is nothing of substance that I could find at this stage. Maybe it is a case of too soon NealeWellington (talk) 09:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note this page should be of interest to you all as it states
 * Want to become notable with a Wikipedia page? Our, team of trusted Wikipedia consultants create pages for our clients. After we have achieved top tier press features for you, we will create, reference, and submit your write up to Wikipedia. With 10 years of experience in writing and editing Wikipedia pages, we have a very credible rating. This will highly increase the chances of your profile being accepted by Wikipedia. . NealeWellington (talk) 09:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . I've filed an ANI report.  Schwede 66  10:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I think we are allowed to delete. Yes, there's lots of media stuff about her, but everything I looked at was clearly the result of her own publicity activities. If your business is getting people into the limelight, you can do it for yourself too: get yourself interviewed, issue the right press releases to the right people at the right time. We really need evidence that someone chose to write about her without her doing the behind-the-scenes prompting, and that at least some of the information isn't coming more-or-less directly from her. It is nearly impossible to write good articles about publicists because of the nature of what they do. In this case she hasn't helped us (or her case) by producing a vast quantity of PR that will dilute out any "real" independent information. Elemimele (talk) 14:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Even without the paid-editing concerns, when you take away the things that do not show notability, such as interviews, churnalism, articles written by the individual, and trivial mentions (such as sources that mention a designer label or Prestidge Group but have only a passing mention of the individual) and there's no sources that would show notability per WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. - Aoidh (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. No signs of in-depth coverage of Briar Prestidge by independent sources.—Alalch E. 22:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Article creator has been involved in very few topics. Article reeks of self promotion. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.