Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brickfilm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  05:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Brickfilm

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not sure that this is notable. Topic already covered to some extent in the main Lego article. Frankie Roberto (talk) 09:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 00:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - No significant 3rd party coverage; essentially a neologism. EeepEeep (talk) 21:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as above, although if we're being really really generous a redirect to Lego might be appropriate. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Though the current sources in the article might be poor, this is a notable topic. Please note that articles about 'brickfilms' exist in wikipedias of 8 other languages. There are 120.000 google hits and several websites devoted to the topic such as brick-cinema.com and brickfilms.com  SPLETTE &#32;:]&#32;How's my driving? 22:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - this is a form of stop motion animation that has received significant coverage in reliable sources. Examples: , . -- Whpq (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.