Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brickster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – sgeureka t•c 10:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Brickster

 * - ( View AfD View log *)

When creating pages on individual characters, they need to establish notability to have seperate articles. And I don't see any of that in this Lego Island character's article. The info is all original research (including the history section), unencyclopedic and unsourced (it has been tagged for citations for FOUR YEARS from November 2006 and there have been none given at all). It is also written a bit like a game guide which Wikipedia is certainly not. Additionally, the character has never been known as "Brick Maldonado". Therefore this article is useless for Wikipedia, especially since the characters article already has a bit of info about this character. Perhaps merge it there. trainfan01 18:47, August 8, 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Qwerp Qwertus  Talk  ツ   01:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:RS. No claim or evidence that the topic has been subject of significant coverage independent of the works in which it appears. --EEMIV (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:SIGCOV, subject only appears in a few video games and has no evidence of additional cultural impact (i.e. Mario, Fox McCloud, etc. Also, as nom pointed out, the subject already has a listing on the game's character list page. AP1787 (talk) 02:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Chris (talk) 10:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge No point in it having it's own page as it clearly fails policy, but maybe there is a little knowlege that could be better placed if it was put in the Character article. The C of E.          God Save The Queen! (talk) 10:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lego Island is a rapid solution. Certainly not notable enough for an article. Marasmusine (talk) 21:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge It has some notability just not enough for an article. JDDJS (talk) 04:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly fails policy such as WP:V and WP:N due to a lack of third party sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - nothing whatsoever to cover WP:GNG and WP:RS. Maybe if this was referring to a generic minifig (character) then I would be more apt to leave it open, but this is a non-notable character with no coverage. --Teancum (talk) 15:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.