Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridge-to-bridge station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ship station.  Sandstein  18:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Bridge-to-bridge station

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No non-trivial mentions &#91;Username Needed&#93; 10:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Is there some article to which this could be merged? bd2412  T 03:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to ship station. This is a type of ship station operation and as part of US Federal and NTIA standards, we have reliable authoritative sources to back up the material. The ship station article would provide better context. It could always be spun back out if someone wants to substantially develop this topic. --Mark viking (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to ship station, as suggested above. Text seems to be a copy paste of section 6-3 of this official manual. Not quite sure what the deletoin rationale of the Nom actually was, but thanks for bringing it to our attention anyway. Nick Moyes (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.