Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridge21


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Bridge21

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG quite clearly. A lot of poor quality coverage includes passing mentions or what looks like paid features of no real substance. PK650 (talk) 00:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content. References invariable are mentions-in-passing or based on company announcements and other PR. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 12:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.