Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgeland Community


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. - Bobet 00:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Bridgeland Community

 * — (View AfD)

this appears to be a development company spamming WP with their development plans Jefferson Anderson 21:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It doesn't even really say where this place is. There is no indication that it's any different from any other subdivision anyplace.  No assertion of notability, no sources... Oh I see, it's in Texas (that's on the talk page). Still, no relevance. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 21:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The article SHOULD be at Bridgeland, Texas - Let me redirect NOW. WhisperToMe 21:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * HELP! There were more revisions, but I don't know what the fuck happened to them! Help me find them! By the way, this is a real planned community in Harris County, Texas. We need to slap Tanjal's wrist (or face) for losing the revisions, if he is guilty. WhisperToMe 21:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * See Tanjal's edit history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tanjal923 WhisperToMe 21:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I reverted this to a more palatable form. WhisperToMe 21:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is a master planned community north of Houston, similar to Kingwood. Postoak 00:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Neither cite any references. Have these places been written about in local media? I might change my "vote" if they became referenced. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 15:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes - Bridgeland article has links to the Houston Chronicle articles. WhisperToMe 23:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I converted them using tags to make them easier to find. I would have used Template:Cite News on them, but one of the links doesn't work.  Still, only two links both to the same paper doesn't quite meet the "multiple non-trivial mentions in reliable sources" that WP:Note calls for, but it is better than I had thought it was.  Now, if you can get citation informtaion for the one that the link doesn't work... ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 17:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I fixed the url :) WhisperToMe 05:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I have reduced the article to the present and immediate future and removed a good deal of the advertising language. With the changes, I  am willing to consider it a weak keep.DGG 00:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.