Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridget Perrier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Bridget Perrier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Activist of strictly local notability. Fails guidelines in WP:BIO. Kelly hi! 21:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lots of info here that the subject may not want on the internet. Legacypac (talk) 07:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 12:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 12:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - I'm seriously skeptical WP:BEFORE is actually being followed now. And Lots of info here that the subject may not want on the internet is ridiculous. She's an activist and public speaker. She has a Gofundme campaign. She obviously wants this on the Internet. Passes WP:BIO. Vice, CBC, International Business Times, The Star, National Post, National Post, Feminist Current (news clip), CityNews, Toronto Observer, Native News Network (via SOTT), tbnews, Tulalipnews, Winnipeg Free Press, aptn, Hamilton Spectator, Canada.com, Kincardine Independent... Some of these are better than others, to be sure, but all reliable sources, not all local, and she's a big part of if not the subject of all of them. Every page of ghits returns more and more. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 13:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rhodo. Everyking (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Unless we rewrite the notability criteria. Collect (talk) 21:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rhodo. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 03:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lots of sources highlighted here by Rhododendrites, plus even more available on Google News.  Stories range from a few days ago to several years ago, showing a substantial and sustained amount of coverage. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.