Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgeton House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Bridgeton House

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Old building (not registered on NRHP), cannot find sources or content to support notability. Only sources in the article are directory-style travel guides and a passing mention ("What's Doing in Bucks County") in NYT. Schazjmd  (talk)  17:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  Schazjmd   (talk)  17:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment The tools aren't automatically including it, but there was a prior AfD in 2009; see WP:Articles for deletion/Bridgeton House (Lib326). Schazjmd   (talk)  17:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete We created the business Bridgeton House in 1981, in this building. How it got on wikipedia as just a building that happens to be a hotel is the problem. You are using our name & google is capturing it and using it as a search tool for a business. The only 'historical' thing about this building is that it was created into a hotel & provides lodging, since 1981.It prevents us from capturing the Hotel page that all hotels are eligible for when searching under their 'business' names in google. It includes reviews, rates & links to our website. This is the problem- it's deadheading into the wiki 'Box' https://www.google.com/search?channel=cus3&client=firefox-b-1-d&q=bridgeton+house Wiki shows up & our listing does not. We know wiki is not a business directory but it is stopping us from being shown, only to highlight a building named Bridgeton House that we created. By removing it you you make it accurate for the searcher, searching for Bridgeton House the hotel, not a random building in Pennsylvania.What it should be is this https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&channel=cus3&ei=KpzrXvyZJ66EytMPtu6cgAk&q=bridgeton+houseinn&oq=bridgeton+houseinn&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIECAAQDTIECAAQDTIKCAAQCBANEAoQHjoECAAQRzoGCAAQDRAKUMpxWJJ2YP2FAWgAcAF4AIABaogBlwKSAQMyLjGYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwj81qb96YvqAhUugnIEHTY3B5AQ4dUDCAs&uact=5We have asked you to correct this, we have begged Google to stop using you to override the "Hotel" box we are entitled to- they say to contact you & you say to contact them. This is a very costly error that could easily be remedied by removing this article. It only confuses the searcher & penalizes a small business struggling in a covid economy. Our industry has been devastated by closures & the simple act of understanding what Wiki misinformation is doing to the Business & frustrating the searcher is the FACT that should be considered as a reason to delete this article  BwBriggs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BwBriggs (talk • contribs) 18:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I don't think that the commercial / COI concerns by BwBriggs are relevant for our purposes, so we need more input.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as simply not notable, as I can't find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I agree that commercial concerns are irrelevant, and I very much doubt that removing this from Wikipedia will make any difference whatsoever to their level of bookings. If I was looking for a hotel to stay in I would be impressed by the fact that it had an interesting history. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. --Lockley (talk) 08:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.