Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgette Monet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 02:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Bridgette Monet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spartaz Humbug! 23:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. This nomination is WP:WAX, but the subject is clearly not notable. Fails PORNBIO and GNG with no significant reliable source coverage and no awards. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as currently not better satisfying the applicable notability, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  01:29, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable pornographic film actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete She was pretty well known during her career but she fails PORNBIO as it is now and doesn't have enough coverage to pass the GNG. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Deletenon-notable. VanEman (talk) 18:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication os sufficient reliable sourcing to support a BLP article. The apparent lack of significant book coverage for a supposedly significant performer from this era is striking. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails both WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.