Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briefsism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete (Liberatore, 2006). 12:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Briefsism


I believe this article may be a hoax; there are other 'isms' out there we do not know of, but this one is a suspected hoax, I haven't found any reliable sources. Hence the nomination for AFD. HorroWiol 10:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per above, as well as WP:V, WP:CITE as well as common sense.  Killfest2 — Daniel.Bryant  10:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, article is genuine, verifiable, was mentioned on 2-TEN FM a few months ago. --JasonWHall1 10:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * — Possible single purpose account: JasonWHall1 (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.


 * Keep, verified, covered in many tabloids in the UK. --Bus Driver Matthew R 10:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * — Possible single purpose account: Bus Driver Matthew R (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Still, it fails WP:CITE, WP:NOTE and WP:V. Also, it could be considered unencyclopaedic.  Killfest2 — Daniel.Bryant  10:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete (CSD G3) as obvious vandalism. Deli nk 10:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Not nonsense, a topic of a paper by Roger Johanssen, not a joke, proper article. --SomersetWalkSand 11:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * — Possible single purpose account: SomersetWalkSand (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.


 * Keep, genuine article, proof of it exists... I know! --LockAndKey12 11:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * — Possible single purpose account: LockAndKey12 (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.