Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigadier Harold Evelyn William Bell Kingsley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW, WP:NOTBURO The Bushranger One ping only 01:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Brigadier Harold Evelyn William Bell Kingsley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: neither being a brigadier nor being an ADC to the crown is sufficient for notability. Delete. Bristolbottom (talk) 17:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I note that the nominator has only been an editor since 30 August 2014, and from this and other nominations for Afd, seems to lack a sufficient understanding of the notability guidelines.  I also note that all, or almost all, of the nominator's edits relate to deletion requests. --Bejnar (talk) 07:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep a brigadier with a DSO seems to meet WP:SOLDIER, I admit that the article needs both renaming to remove the rank, and expansion to include, interalia, the reason for the DSO. --Bejnar (talk) 08:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * keep No policy-based reason for deletion. The nominator seems to have a WP:COI with User:MJT21.--114.81.255.37 (talk) 12:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)--114.81.255.37 (talk) 11:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. As a brigadier, clearly meets WP:SOLDIER. As a recipient of the CIE, clearly meets WP:ANYBIO #1. Getting a bit fed up with this editor's scattergun nomination of people who clearly meet our notability guidelines. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep No policy basis for deletion, and per above. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 02:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep but move as suggested. Being aide de camp to the head of state of the empire on which the sun never set, is a big deal. Bearian (talk) 15:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.