Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brighouse Town F.C. season 2008-09


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 07:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Brighouse Town F.C. season 2008-09

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Season-by-season articles should not run to teams as low down the football league ladder as Brighouse Town F.C. because they do not gain enough notability from independent sources. Secondly the information on this page is entirely wrong and relates to Huddersfield Town and not Brighouse Town Peanut4 (talk) 01:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Peanut4 (talk) 01:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 01:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Yellowweasel (talk) 01:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. – PeeJay 01:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely ♣ Princess  Clown  ♥ 02:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's all well and good using an existing article as a "template" for a new one, but the creator could at least have changed something other than the title before bunging it straight into mainspace. Oh, and even if he had it would still have been a delete, as this team is far too far down the English football league system to merit individual season articles -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - I've never laughed at anything on Wikipedia as much as I have just done: that's not Brighouse Town FC's 08/09 season page, that's a (very slightly) changed version of Huddersfield Town F.C.'s 08/09 season page. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  09:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If the data was right, it would still be a delete as Brighouse Town are too low down the ladder, but as it stands it's one step away from being a WP:HOAX. --Ged UK (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Uksam88 (talk) 20:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.