Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bright Interactive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Bright Interactive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable, google search brings no independent coverage results. per WP:CORP, notability is not inherited. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 19:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete same rationale as above, I've never seen so little information on a company Appable (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Upon a cursory search the only major independent coverage I see is . The article creator lacks clue in a major way, including non-existent categories; probably a COI entry. That said, if there is actually more significant coverage in independent RSs that I am not aware of, I could switch my !vote. Softlavender (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:ORG by a long way. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting companies. SmartSE (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think it fails WP:NOTPROMO because it's written fairly neutrally. It's not notable, but I don't think it's overtly promotional or only on Wikipedia as an advertisement for the company. Appable (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.