Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bright Wizard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  16:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Bright Wizard

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Class in a game with only primary or unreliable sources and no assertion of notability. &mdash; Coren (talk) 23:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It is virtually impossible for a class selection from an unreleased game to have real world notability. So it's not shocking that this article doesn't demonstrate any. gnfnrf (talk) 01:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete advance promotion for a commercial release. Drivel: among whom is this purported to be a popular choice if it hasn't been released yet? ~ Ningauble (talk) 01:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's an ad, plus there's no notability whatsoever. RockManQ (talk) 02:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - There's no need for a page on every class in a game. There's no notability nor any need for such a page.Caidh (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect Back to the actual game. Its not even out yet! rootology ( C )( T ) 05:55, 30 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.