Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brighton Anonymous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to  Anonymous (group).  MBisanz  talk 20:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Brighton Anonymous

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Organisation that has not been mentioned in reliable 3-rd party sources. Does not seem notable enough for inclusion.  ♪Tempo  di Valse ♪  20:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No notable sources found, so I have to say Delete. Thanks,  Genius  101 Guestbook  20:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge with Anonymous (group). I cannot justify a stand-alone article, for lack of notability and verification in reliable sources. Perhaps a mention in Anonymous (group) is appropriate. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  23:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  23:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  23:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. Perhaps redirect it to the parent organization.  Them  From  Space  00:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 00:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge per LinguistAtLarge. tedder (talk) 00:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No merge, no redirect. No third party coverage, no notability whatsoever, either on its own or in relation to parent organisation. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge - Let relevant Editors decide what to keep and what to toss. Relevant Editors would know where to acquire sourcing better that us. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  23:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.