Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brighton Launch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Brighton Launch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pomotional article with no sources that fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. BonkHindrance (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 01:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 01:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete This fails on so many counts, most notably (no pun) that of notability. And I have a hunch RS citations may be hard to come by. As a very short stub, it also has no context and no content, and while those could be worked on, I don't quite see the point as it stands. Happy to be proven wrong, if someone can help me understand what makes this organisation noteworthy. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I PRODed the page as unsourced and no claim of notability. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:ORG. The author has been blocked after repeatedly removing the AfD notice. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would have !voted to merge as this article appears to be about a program at Brighton School in Toronto, but on the DAB page for Brighton School there's only a redlink for Brighton School (Ontario, Canada). I did find one independent, reliable secondary source (A lesson in skills for life) and one comparison site that may or may not rely upon data entered by someone at the school (Our Kids - Brighton Launch). Even so, not enough for notability. The article is currently poorly written and without any refs, so there is no use even in userfying or draftifying what's there, in my opinion. By process of elimination, the only option left is to delete. — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 22:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. No signs of notability. Dorama285 (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * delete can we just snow delete this nonsense already? Praxidicae (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per everybody else. No signs of notability. – Frood (talk) 17:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.