Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brighton Women's Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Brighton Women's Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization. Nothing to differentiate this women's organization from many others like it throughout the UK and the world. Citations refer to coverage from primary sources and local media only. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  00:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment Google News link above turned up a few hits in The Independent. AadaamS (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete per nom - No different from any other small charity in the UK. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – Has been covered twice recently by the Independent  in relation to an important national issue (sentencing reform), and there are several in-depth profiles on Google  . Meets GNG. (BTW, don't go to the home page of the thewomensresourcecentre -- it has been hacked by Islamic extremists. Or do go,  if you are interested in that sort of thing. I had never seen it before.) – Margin1522 (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment – without committing to deletion, keeping or another outcome. I checked through various published (offline) sources I have about Brighton, and found no mention in any.  In particular, I would have expected at least a passing reference in The New Encyclopaedia of Brighton (Rose Collis, 2010).  That said, there may well be other books in the libraries down here which do mention the Centre.   Hassocks  5489 (Floreat Hova!)  13:29, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete most references are not independent. --Mr. Guye (talk) 04:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr. Guye (talk) 04:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – Has been cited as national best practice e.g. New Economics Foundation and as reported in the Independent. It is arguably at least of regional significance as they operate across Sussex. (disclaimer: I did create the page) Mdnl55 (talk) 09:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.