Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brijwood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:13, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Brijwood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find no reliable references mentioning the term. Term was supposedly coined by "Jais Chauhan". Article was initially created by user:Jschauhan2013, and user:Jschauhan2016 just re-created his biography at Jais Chauhan. In my opinion this term fails our notability guidelines, see WP:MADEUP. Amalthea 15:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be a Neologism announced by Jais Chauhan (blocked user Jschauhan2013) see this press release which, despite Chauhan's attempts to broaden its usage, has not caught on. - Arjayay (talk) 14:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best as this is still questionable for the needed notability improvements, nothing else or any better context to suggest this. SwisterTwister   talk  04:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:40, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:40, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete There are two spellings, Brijwood and Brajwood, but even when searching for both of them I can't find sources that the term is notable. The -wood suffix is very productive but every coined word ending in -wood, and denoting a cinema industry, is not notable. --bonadea contributions talk 09:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. This could almost be WP:CSD obviously invented. JohnCD (talk) 20:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)


 * more:
 * alt:
 * Brij Bhasha:
 * WP:INDAFD: Brijwood Brajwood


 * Delete for while the term is not made-up, it lacks wide enough usage to meet our notability criteria.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:18, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * FTR, your searches point to Times of India pages which apparently uses the categories from the respective Wikipedia pages for its content (without attribution, as far as I can tell), one of them being Category:Brijwood. That's why the term showed up there, citogenesis. Amalthea  11:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.