Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brilliant Labs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  21:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Brilliant Labs

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet WP:NCORP. Macbeejack &#9742;  13:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Software,  and Singapore. Macbeejack  &#9742;  13:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Like I said elsewhere, I added categories to it and linked to it elsewhere on Wikipedia. That should satisfy two criticisms.
 * Besides that, it's worth pointing out that the three sources are major outlets. It's not quite scientific, but that seems like it establishes a reasonable basis for being notable. It's also supported by major investors, although I didn't add those in - not yet, anyway. I'm debating in my mind how to do it without being promotional.
 * https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/ar-glasses-multimodal-ai-nets-140019767.html#:~:text=Since%20its%20inception%20in%202019,at%20Y%20Combinator%3B%20and%20others. Rjohnson1980 (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes at least WP:NPRODUCT, and probably WP:NCORP. Besides the Forbes (staff) and Axios articles already cited, The Verge, South China Morning Post . ~ A412  talk! 01:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Both The Verge and Axios weren't really about the company but the Forbes and South China Morning Post pieces are good and seem to satisfy WP:NCORP. Editing84 (talk) 12:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. The references provided to date all rely entirely on interviews/quotes from company officials and other information provided by the company.  HighKing++ 13:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.