Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bringelly Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Bringelly Road

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article makes no claim of notability and provides no sources. I don't see how it would be able to meet WP:NGEO. — F ORMAL D UDE  ( talk ) 16:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — F ORMAL D UDE  ( talk ) 16:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Probably qualifies for a speedy too, maybe A7? SportingFlyer  T · C  17:52, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I think so too. I submitted for A3 and A7. — F ORMAL D UDE  ( talk ) 19:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Aah, I forgot A7 is topic-restricted. SportingFlyer  T · C  22:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GEO and despite the category it has been placed in, it's not even a highway. Deus et lex (talk) 03:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. It exists, but that's about it. No indication of notability. The only coverage I can find is routine, e.g. construction news. -- Kinu t/c 20:29, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: No significant Coverage found and not pass general notability guidelines. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:55, 30 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.