Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bristol +


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Bristol +

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm unable to find RS to show this meets GNG &mdash; Rod talk 15:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * See also: Articles for deletion/E3 Media (2nd nomination) & Articles for deletion/Mike Bennett (businessman).&mdash; Rod talk 20:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as there's hardly even general notability here. SwisterTwister   talk  20:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete challenging to search for the topic on search engines but I couldn't find anything. Based on the page it clearly fails the notability guidelines, just two non-independent citations and the topic is not likely to be notable. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I am also unable to find any evidence of WP:N being satisfied. This seem to be part of a small set of self-referencing articles with no indication of notability from independent sources. Johnuniq (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.