Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britannica Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Britannica Party

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable political party. I can find nothing in news sources beyond a bare mention for getting 11 votes in a council by-election in Glasgow Hillhead this month. Appear to be a split of Scottish BNP, so it has been discussed on the UK far-right forums and blogs, e.g. the "Advanced Ape" referenced (blog of an ex-BNP and British Freedom Party member), but nothing reliable. Fences &amp;  Windows  21:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  —Mais oui! (talk) 04:52, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Tiny political party, fails WP:CORP, no non-trivial reliable sources. 2 lines of K  303  13:19, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

The Britannica Party : For British Culture with British Values for British People. Britannica supports the Union of Britain,with all its citizens being treated equally. Britannica advocates that the role of government is to provide for secure borders, law and order, health, education and welfare. The private sector, should be given strategic and fiscal support in the provision of utilities and infrastructure. European countries are respected from their longstanding cultural and trading association with Britain. However, British sovereignty is non negotiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charles Baillie (talk • contribs) 18:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Is this a joke? "It contested a Glasgow City Council Hillhead by-election in 2011. The candidate Charles Baillie (BTW note the username of the editor who posted the comment above) came last with 11 votes (0.35%)." Assuming this is not a joke, this "party" is still completely non-notable. Google News search finds literally nothing. --MelanieN (talk) 22:32, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.