Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Airways Flight 117


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 17:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

British Airways Flight 117

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD, notice removed without rationale on talk page & witout edit summary. Appears to be an unremarkable aviation incident. TheLongTone (talk) 13:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AIRCRASH not to mention WP:GNG. A flight has a mechanical problem and turned around. Happens everyday around the world....William 15:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William 15:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions....William 15:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William 15:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable event, warning light comes on aircraft returns, just one of those things that happens. MilborneOne (talk) 15:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I was on a flight that had one of the engines explode on takeoff. It stopped and returned, too. That wasn't notable either. Mildly exciting, yes, notable, no. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:AIRCRASH. All on board survived (which is great), however the aircraft did not sustain any serious damage. --    LuK3      (Talk)   17:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per everyone above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:30, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Since the dawn of aviation there have been a very large number of incidents due to mechanical failure, human error, weather, hostile action and so forth. Were Wikipedia to attempt to catalogue them all then by the same logic it should include every identifiable marine event in which a vessel was in danger, every hazardous railway incident, every building fire in which lives were in danger, every road accident and near miss where a significant number of people were at risk, etc, etc. It does not, and it should not. --AJHingston (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per obvious lack of notability and WP:NOT. RedSoxFan2434 (talk) 00:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete A seemingly routine incident that had no notable consequences that would prove worthy of a standalone article as indicated in WP:AIRCRASH. Mkdw talk 08:07, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.