Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Armenian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cab's sources seems to address the concerns over notability and verifiability. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

British Armenian

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No indication that Armenians in the United Kingdom are notable. No coverage in news sources, or on Google Scholar. 2001 UK Census recorded only few people born in Armenia. No indication that they think of themselves as a group.--NovaSkola (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Plus there are some major BLP concerns here. The one individual on the list of supposed Armenians I checked out appears to have one Armenian great grandparent and there is no evidence that person considers themself be Armenian. I42 (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Rename Armenians in the United Kingdom. British Armenians isn't a valid topic, but it is clearly established that the inhabitants of one state in another is a worthy article topic. Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 22:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or rename. It doesn't matter if there's one or one million British Armenians. It's still just as notable as the British Chinese or British Indian articles. Spiderone (talk) 08:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, the topic of the article isn't notable. There's no inherent notability for this type of article as Spiderone and Deacon of Pndapetzim would have us believe.  We have standards of notability and verifiability and this subject fails WP:NOTE as stated by the nominator. Drawn Some (talk) 23:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There is not enough evidence to support this article.--NovaSkola (talk) 19:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: Striking duplicate !vote. Tavix | Talk  21:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete. Insufficient notability to meet guidelines.--LightAtmosphere (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC) — LightAtmosphere (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep and rename/snip list of people where required. Two minutes on google books found tens of thousands of words printed about this topic:
 * Thanks, cab (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, cab (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, cab (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, cab (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong keep and expand - Very notable and sourced. Badagnani (talk) 03:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.