Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Association of Cosmetic Doctors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

British Association of Cosmetic Doctors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches found no good coverage aside from here and here. With this article from December with no significant improvement, it also seems they may have closed as their website no longer works and there are no solid recent mentions (aside from a passing mention from March at a university page. SwisterTwister   talk  02:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It's now "The British College of Aesthetic Medicine"; see http://bcam.ac.uk/about-bcam/history/. But my searches for that string in Google Scholar, Google Books and NewsBank UK & Ireland failed to find any significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, so delete. Qwfp (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  06:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable professional association, only source is their own website, no coverage to pass WP:ORGDEPTH Kraxler (talk) 21:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG since only reference is their own website.Jakejr (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator and Kraxler. The criteria in WP:ORGDEPTH have not been met as there have been no reliable independent sources presented to verify any claims. Notability has not been demonstrated for this organisation. As Qwfp notes, the use of this term as a redirect in the future would depend on the British College Of Aesthetic Medicine emerging as a notable organisation. Drchriswilliams (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.