Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Association of Mountain Guides


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 00:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

British Association of Mountain Guides

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

not notable, I could not find a notable third-party mention, therefore fails WP:ORG Carabinieri 19:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep: Inherently notable in the real world, but needs third party recognition.  Ombudsman 21:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You have to give reasons why its notable and I've looked for third party recognition and did not find it.--Carabinieri 21:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Third party recognition here, and here and here and here for a start. All of these mentions are from outside the organisation itself. The article needs work and sourcing but it looks as if it possible to do that. --Bduke 11:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep For those who couldn't find evidence of notability, it may be worth the reminder that  the first step is to look at the home p. & see the nature of the organization its work & other organization working with it.  DGG 22:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep. Certainly has third-party recognition, not the least of which is the org's membership in the UIAGM.  'Twould be great to see some expansion on the stub.    ◉ ghoti  07:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.