Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Columbia Conservatory of Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

British Columbia Conservatory of Music

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is a music school for which I am unable to locate in depth coverage in reliable sources. Subject does not meet WP:GNG. Google search revealed such hits as: 4 square, face book, yelp, and local directories. There were hits for "Royal Conservatory of Music", but that is a different entity. Some performers listed subject among venues in tours and CV's. There are Google books hits for books credited to subject, and some books that include subject in lists. There is no substantial coverage. WP:Gale search was also unavailing through my library. Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: There's really no content here. If the article creator can dig up significant profiles about the school in major newspapers, it is probably notable.  Not much worth saving at the moment.--Milowent • hasspoken  12:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — foxj 00:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 19:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- advocacy, being cited only to the org itself. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The school is legit enough to be officially recognized (to some extent) by the province.  There's no sign of notability.  --Lockley (talk) 01:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.