Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Rail Class 937


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of British Rail departmental multiple unit classes. Daniel (talk) 23:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

British Rail Class 937
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Entire article is WP:OR. Has been hatnoted as uncited for 12 years. Prepopots (talk) 06:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No indications of notability, and I cannot find anything online apart from mirrors. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect (and tag with r with possibilities) to List of British Rail departmental multiple unit classes per comments showing the probable existence of offline sources on this at Articles for deletion/British Rail Class 930 and as a valid WP:ATD. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 05:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of British Rail departmental multiple unit classes as RandomCanadian. My Platform 5 spotting guide from 1996 does confirm the five units of this "class" and under the "Class 937" designation, but doesn't say anything further about them. Mackensen (talk) 13:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect yes redirect to the suggested target above rather than deletion.VirenRaval89 (talk) 13:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per others ... not spending a lot of time as nom. has done several at once. Stuff generally available at railcar.co.uk via coach numbers (likely sps but likely accurate) and would be in the UK rail magazines to which I dont subscribe.Djm-leighpark (talk) 03:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.