Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Right Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Core desat 05:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

British Right Alliance

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Describes completely non-notable vanity political party Sdyfshj (talk) 03:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC) — Sdyfshj (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete, non notable political party, search turned up no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I won't be taking a stance on this (I know the leader too well to be able to take an unbiased stance), but I will note that it's not as such a vanity party. I happen to know they'll be publishing a manifesto document in the near future, and launching a website at some point; they also plan to stand candidates in the next general election. The leader's increasingly becoming well-known locally, and is a leader of NO2ID. I would personally advise deletion until such a time as the manifesto is published, however. JJE (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesnt seem notable to me and seems incredibly unlikely to gain much notability in the future. The Electoral Commision source suggests this may be a one man party and the article was created by a user of the same name. He is not a 'leader of NO2ID' as stated above but merely a regional contact. --Neon white (talk) 01:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Why not just for once let things be instead of seeking to censor. We are an active political party, we have more than one member and we will be contesting future elections. I happen to know that this page has been of use to people who have not heard of the party to find out more about it. It is in fact likely that we will be contesting elections at a Parliamentry level in the next few years. Is space so limited that all this constant deletion of everything is needed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterlucas (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. The notability of this party is certainly not made out; a single candidate in a single local election who did not get many votes is not. The procedures for setting up a party are not onerous, and these parties might consist of a tiny membership. Sam Blacketer (talk) 23:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment:: Answer me Is space so limited that all this constant deletion of everything is needed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterlucas (talk • contribs) 04:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.