Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britney's Dance Beat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  12:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Britney's Dance Beat

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The "reviews" are in most instances, one-liners, while others are incredibly short blurbs. There is only a single in-depth review. For over a decade was part of Britney Spears products, until it was split without attribution. Does not meet WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 12:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The game passes WP:GNG as there is a lot of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Some of them are already cited: GameSpot, IGN, PC Gamer, The Cincinnati Enquirer, Entertainment Weekly (dead link, ), GameSpy, GameZone, AllGame. But I found even more than that: Gamekult, 4Players (has 2 pages + 3rd pros and cons one), The Electric Playground , Jeuxvideo.com , Meristation , The Washington Post . I am pretty sure there is probably even more, especially in the United States' newspapers. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - There are many in-depth reviews already on the article, definitely not just 'short blurbs' and I believe it by far passes notability guidelines. Some of the reviews are brief, but the majority of them are in-depth reviews. See Eurogamer, GameSpot, GameSpy, and IGN for instance. Waxworker (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: The references clearly satisfy WP:GNG, as demonstrated from the article and as others have pointed out. DocFreeman24 (talk) 19:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes notability guidelines. Majority contains in-depth reviews, Myconcern (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.