Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britney Rears (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 03:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Britney Rears
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFILM. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: I thought it was going to be a speedyable gag name! You can imagine my surprise when I clicked. Jergling (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Now as the principal author of Jar Jar Binks Must Die, I can understand why certain article titles are attractive. But this article is bereft of independent, nonpromotional sourcing and makes no legitimate claim of notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 02:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm extremely disappointed with this article .... I had high expectations!, Anyway non notable franchise fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge all relevant content to VCA Pictures as a couple of the films from this series have been one of several of the most top-selling adult films of 2005-06. Guy1890 (talk) 02:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable film.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:59, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the above. Notability has not been properly established.  → Call me  Razr   Nation  10:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Examination of the !votes shows that there is no argument for deletion.  One argument reports looking at the article; but WP:N is not a content guideline, so article content is not determinative for notability concerns.  Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED.  Given the community consensus from the previous AfD, notability concensus is not in dispute.  Unscintillating (talk) 17:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- an unremarkable film series with no indications of notability or significance. Sources are not there to build a balanced article (see: WP:WHYN), as they are routine industry coverage and award nomination materials. Does not meet WP:FILM as the one award listed is trivial. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:WHYN was rejected a almost a decade ago as a part of the WP:N guideline proper. Just within the last week the community has again rejected having a WP:DEL-REASON for, "Insufficient sources to write an article that meets the core content policies of WP:V and WP:NPOV."  Unscintillating (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:WHYN is still a part of WP:N. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.