Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittany Affair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete and redirect to Louis-René de Caradeuc de La Chalotais. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Brittany Affair

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * SEE ALSO Articles for deletion/Luminescent (horse). This is part of a walled garden. There are others as a group listed there. This should probable be included there as well.  Dloh  cierekim  01:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Non-notable horse. A speedy deletion tag was removed on the grounds that there is no speedy deletion criteria for horses (which is debatable), a PROD tag was removed by the creator of the article, with no explanation. The original editor has been blocked for repeatedly creating articles about non-notable horses. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Louis-René de Caradeuc de La Chalotais because the horse is not notable but the Brittany affair is, even if it doesn't have an article. Drawn Some (talk) 22:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and then recreate as a redirect per User:Drawn Some. Racehourse appears completely non-notable so no point keeping the article or it's history but it does appear to be a sensible redirect to something completgely seperate.  I agreed with the removal of the speedy (which was actually removed incorrectly by the creator) on the grounds that a horse is clearly not "a real person, an organization (...), or web content" and so is not eligable for A7 (personally I think animals and fictional people should be eligable but at the moment they're not so it was an incorrect tagging). Dpmuk (talk) 22:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I wanted to tag the articles as db-horse per WP:BLH, but I didn't see an option for that in Twinkle. :) --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * per Dpmuk No assertion of significance. CSD does not cover horses, so here we are. I searched and found no hint of notability. Not even a relevant G Hit. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  01:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.