Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittinea Campbell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 17:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Brittinea Campbell

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A "myspace celebrity" who does not meet our basic criteria for notability at this time. While there are obviously a lot of Ghits on social network sites for this individual, there are also zero Google news hits, and I'm just not seeing any WP:RS. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral vote leaning towards weak deleteThis is a well constructed stub with references and a claim of notability. However, a search for "Brittinea Campbell" at Bing returns a whopping total of 49 pages. I have friends that have more returns at Bing. I'm generally an inclusionist, but there's little chance that an article about someone with so little coverage is going to be kept due to WP:V and WP:RS. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 01:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Clear example of where sources don't indicate notability. Shadowjams (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with Shadowjams. The references included in the article provide the appearance of notability, but they do not actually bolster the individual's notability to a level that merits inclusion. Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 18:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.