Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittney Skye (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   too soon to relist. Spartaz Humbug! 10:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Brittney Skye
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A porno actress who is still as non-notable as she was last time her article was AfD'd (three weeks ago). Let's see if it'll close on a solid yay-or-nay this time rather than "no consensus". Раціональне анархіст (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Dude this is too soon. Refer to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Given a no-consensus sputter-death over the holiday break while most of us were preoccupied, this is more like a "bump" than a challenge.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 06:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:POINTY nomination. The previous discussion looks like an easy keep. Using the rational of Christmas was in the way of the last discussion isn't valid. Should all the deleted articles between 21st and 31st Dec be restored so they have another chance?  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 10:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - This was only closed on the 31st .... and 2 days later you renominate it .... Just because it was closed around the Xmas period doesn't mean you can renominate it days later!, Also the actual AFD went on for an entire month, WP:POINTY much?. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. The previous AFD ran for nearly a month and was only just closed two days ago. There's indeed no need to restart the process allover again this soon. -- fdewaele, 2 January 2015, 16:07 CET
 * Speedy Keep. WP:POINTY AfD as noted above. Redban, the user who started that last AfD for Skye, was blocked for his disruptive behavior of starting AfD's for notable porn stars. Раціональне анархіст's behavior is very similar to that of Redban's and I think they might be the same user. Rebecca1990 (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Do I have you in for a $100 bet? (We can go to check-user right now.)--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: I'm seeing four Keep votes based on procedural rationales and the fact that the previous AfD creator got himself in trouble. None of these address the merit (or lack thereof) of the article in question.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * That was all discussed in the previous AFD which was only closed two days ago. Things haven't changed since then, making this AFD frivolous. -- fdewaele, 2 January 2015, 21:44 CET.
 * The closer observed: "...Discussion prior to the relist was heavily in favor of the article; afterwards less so...." Xymmax"
 * ...In other words, support was slipping, even in light of the previous nominator poisoning his own soup.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 21:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * You're giving a very one sided summary of the 1st AFD. It's not because two editors argued "delete" in the latter days of the AFD that support was actually slipping. Those votes were easily matched by a couple of new "Keep"s. In the end, a clear majority felt that Skye passed the notability requirement. -- fdewaele, 2 January 2015, 22:12 CET.
 * The summary was "no consensus".--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 21:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.