Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briz District


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. And move, naturally. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Briz District

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication of notability. no extant RS. (Based on name of primary editor, a SPA, there may be CoI issues as well) [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 02:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep but move to its apparent official name Magugpo East. We have reliable proof this district exists, by the inclusion of a Philippines governemnt webpage which says it was legally created by ordinance in 1993. Articles about legally recognised, populated places are generally allowed to remain (according to WP:NGEO). However, there's no proof it's known as Briz and the article will still need proper sourcing to make it suitable. Sionk (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect this and Magugpo East to Tagum City. To my recollection, the consensus is that barangays aren't inherently notable unless they receive enough reliable coverage, so what is usually done is to redirect them to their municipality or city. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:53, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep—but move to Magugpo East (assuming they are, in fact, the same thing). WP:NGEO says that "Populated, legally-recognized places are, by a very large consensus, considered notable", and this barangay was created by a legal ordinance. Granted that a barangy is the smallest recognizable district, we do have articles on US towns, which, as I understand it, are about the same thing. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 19:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - While barangays are indeed the smallest political unit in the Philippine LGC, to my knowledge, barangays are considered by the WikiProject to only be notable if they have been the subject of reliable sources (which is why we have articles for the districts of Manila, such as Sampaloc, Manila, rather than any of Manila's barangays. Note that Manila alone has 700+ barangays, while most cities can have up to 40+). Also, barangays are not equivalent to towns, as a barangay is a subdivision of a municipality or a city, which correspond to cities and town in the United States. WP:NGEO is a good point, however; I'll check the Tambayan Philippines archives if there has been established consensus on the notability of barangays. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'll admit to knowing basically nothing about Philippine geographical organizational units, I'm just going off of NGEO and trying to apply it to the situation, and I fully understand the application might need some "tweaking" to get right. Please do check with any relevant projects and let me/us know if there's a consensus or any guidance on this.  Your effort is appreciated!   Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 15:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.