Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadcast 3.0


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Broadcast 3.0

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A total marketing skit. Non notable term. Reads like whitepaper from company. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep (talk) 19:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Expression is regularly used for describing the current status of broadcast technology, similar to Industry 4.0 in manufacturing technology. A google search brings up plenty entries which are not associated with the company, e.g. here or here .--Andreas.hilmer (talk) 23:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Buzzword obviously rising up to catch the draft of the upcoming television standard ATSC 3.0; company marketing trying and failing to become a common WP:NEO term.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Power~enwiki (talk) 07:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - throwing a number after something does not automatically make a notable neologism. Artw (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.